8月29日雅思大作文预测及

8月29日雅思大作文预测及（精选4篇）

8月29日雅思大作文预测及 篇1

Some people think it is more important for the government to spend more money promoting a healthy lifestyle in order to prevent illnesses than the treatment for people who are already ill. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

题目大意

一些人认为，政府花更多的钱提倡健康的生活方式，以预防疾病，比治疗已经生病的人更重要。你在多大程度上同意或不同意?

思路解析

不同意

当然，有一些人认为，政府支出应该更好地通过促进健康的生活方式来预防疾病的发生，而不是用来治疗那些已经生病的人。对他们来说，目前没有健康问题但正在等待更好生活条件的人数总是多于后者。这意味着宏观经济配置首先要满足大多数纳税主体的需要，以确保投资的说服力。如果这些资金流用于有机食品生产、住宅环境中的健身设施，甚至更好的空气条件，那么这些资金流就被认为是有用的。它们更接近公众的日常健康，而且在某种程度上很容易被证明可以避免某些与食物相关的、久坐不动和污染导向的疾病。而投资在医疗行业的支出似乎比较“隐形”，因为总是只有少数人有身体问题，也很难判断这笔钱最终是否有价值。治疗也存在失败;要验证治愈的患者是因为医疗设施的资金投入还是仅仅因为他们的免疫力而痊愈，这听起来很模糊。

然而，上面提出的想法并没有让人想到医疗领域的投资可能具有的真正重要性，并使他们无法认识到潜在的危险和不合理的一面。无论如何提倡健康生活，我们都必须承认，在某些情况下，我们目前所知的“健康”生活方式并不能有效地“防病”。那么，在卫生史上，一些自相矛盾的健康规则，考虑到某些生活习惯可能是有意义的，或者是有害的，最终被证明是不能接受的，这也就不足为奇了。这还不是全部的事实，直到我们也意识到，对于某些疾病来说，仅仅健康的生活方式肯定是不够的。如果没有系统的医疗专业知识、设施或资源来应对疾病，人们更容易患上疾病。在这种情况下，投资于健康生活推广是非常没有意义的。提示语中的短视思维，使我们不能理性地思考“重要性”的真正含义;因此，这两个投资方向的重要性是不可比拟的，因为我们对目前的医疗保健和对未知的未来的了解仍然有限。

高分写作示范

To access whether the government should invest money in the prevention of illness or the related treatment, I might have to consider how to define certain utterances made by this topic. From the perspective of the government, it is reasonable for them to spend money in the area that is beneficial to the overwhelming people; however, the take-home message is how the government is to define “importance”.

There are, of course, people out there holding that government spending should be better given out to prevent diseases from happening via promoting a healthy lifestyle rather than to treat those who have already been ill. To them, the number of people currently without health problems but awaiting a better living condition is always more than that of the latter. That means the macro-economic allocation should firstly fulfill the need of most of the tax contributors to make sure the investment is persuasive. The financial flows are considered useful if they are used to things like organic food produce, fitness facilities set in residential surroundings, or even better air condition. They are much closer to the daily health of the public and would be somewhat easily proved to avoid certain food-related, sedentariness-driven, and pollution-oriented illnesses. Whereas the expenditure invested in the medical industry seems comparatively “invisible”, as it is always enjoyed solely by the minority who are put into the physical problems, and would be also hard to judge whether this money would be finally valuable. There also exist failures in the treatment; it sounds obscured to verify whether the cured patients get well because of the financial input in the medical facilities or just because of their immunity.

However, the thinking presented above doesn’t allow one to think of real importance that the investment in the medical area may have, and precludes them from recognizing the potential hazards and irrationality that lie. No matter how a healthy life is to promote, one must admit that in some cases, the lifestyle that is deemed “healthy” by our current knowledge cannot effectively “prevent illness”. Then it is not surprising that in the hygiene history, some paradoxical health rules considering certain living habits would be meaningful or harmful, have finally been proved unacceptable. We should also realize that for certain illnesses, the solely healthy lifestyle is certainly not enough. People are prone to diseases easily if there were no systematic medical expertise, facilities, or resources in dealing with them. In that case, investing in a healthy life promotion is spectacularly meaningless. The myopic thinking given in the prompt distracts us from rationally thinking what the “importance” truly means; it is then incomparable between the two investment directions in terms of the importance because of our still limited knowledge to our current health care and to the unknown future.

In conclusion, I would agree that the policy of government investing in a healthy lifestyle cannot be considered more significant than in disease treatment.

相关词汇和语法结构

Utterance 表达

Allocation 分配

8月29日雅思大作文预测及 篇2

Some people think that the main purpose of school is to turn children to good citizens and workers, rather than benefit them as individuals.To what extent do you agree or disagree?

A person in shanghai, with a doctor’s degree, supposed to contribute greatly to the development of the society, turned out to inflict a huge loss valued 3 billion RMB to the country.Thus, whether schools should turn children into qualified citizens and employees or conduct education for their personal benefits is under a heated debate.In my opinion, the former side carries more weight than the latter.Only when students are educated to be good citizens and workers, can the sound progress of the society be maintained, and positive social order be established.Otherwise, the damages from the

well-educated but ill-willed ones may be disasters to others and the nation.Besides, the development of society is based on the contribution of its citizens, which is hard to be achieved when the citizens are not provided reasonable guidance and moral education, no matter how they are powerful in their individual abilities.Educating the children to be ones that are needed in the society will help to serve a guiding light in the growth of the children.They will learn to tell the right from the wrong, and develop into the ones that can contribute to the country rather than the ones to hinder or undermine the development of the society.Also, the children will gradually form into the awareness to be members in the society, rather than focus too much on their own interests to be selfish ones.Admittedly, being trained in skills and enriched in knowledge, the children themselves can, in some sense, benefit a lot in the process of education.However, this is just the side effect of schoolings, and just as we cannot deny the main functions of medicines because of their existing side effects, we cannot turn our attention from the main functions of schools in educating the children to be good citizens and workers to the education for personal benefits.To sum up, the main purpose of schooling is to train children to become the ones needed by the

8月29日雅思大作文预测及 篇3

8月11日上午10时，川主寺镇工会主席王妍双在镇政府三楼会议室主持召开班子例会，镇长蒙成鹏、镇人大主席更登磋、镇党委副书记孙林、镇维稳副书记泽仁扎西、副镇长凌平、副镇长张蓉、副镇长李平、副镇长罗庆玲、副镇长曹明、镇城监队队长郎加他、镇清管所所长曾国洪参加会议。现将会议议定事项纪要如下：

一、强化消防安全管理。副镇长凌平负责镇政府2个便携式消防泵及配套设施的管护，时刻应对突发险情，并起草安全生产通知，及时下发至各宾馆、商铺；镇城监队落实2辆洒水车的日常管护，确保车内24小时有存水。

二、由副镇长罗庆玲负责组织实施磨坎坡停车场公共厕所抛屋顶建设及老镇区生态停车场公共厕所藏式风格外观提升事宜，尽快拿出建设方案，报仁青书记阅处。

三、由本土能工巧匠队、特色帐篷搭设队、专业技术施工队按440元/米的标准，将安多风情街打造工程70%的木材款交付县林业局。

四、镇人大主席更登磋负责组织巴郎村开展川主寺镇生态停车场车辆综合服务区建设前期筹备事宜；镇党委副书记孙林负责、副镇长李平协助开展黄胜关村热隆河坝车辆综合服务区建设前期筹备事宜。

五、镇项目办、镇司法所协同理清并解决上海园林生态护岸工程中遗留的民工工资、工程建设问题。

六、由杨晓丹拟定传子沟村唐卡画院阶段建设方案，镇政府按照工程进度分期拨付80万元的中小企业发展资金。

参会人员：仁青周、蒙成鹏、更登磋、孙林、泽仁扎西、凌平、张蓉、李平、罗庆玲、曹明、王妍双、郎加他、曾国洪。

8月29日雅思大作文预测及 篇4

由于我刚从学校毕业，当我步入工作岗位时，我带有浓重的惰性思维，无论是在工作上还是学习上，惰性思维严重压制了我的工作和学习状态。为了让我尽早扭转惰性思维，尽快适应现在的工作岗位，特此制定周计划，以督促自己。

周计划分为每一天的计划，每一天的计划分为三部分，上午计划，下午计划和下班后计划：

上午计划为：学习《建设工程项目管理》；

下午计划为：利用网络资源加深巩固上午所学习的知识；同时利用网络资源收集《工厂供电》方面的知识；

下班后的计划为：学习《工厂供电》。

如果公司能在这周为我配发电脑并安装好CAD软件，那么，我会调整之前的计划，将学习重点放在CAD初步知识的学习。